Marriage over, €100,000 down the drain: the AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion

## Summary
The Amsterdam-based IT consultant had just ended a contract early. “I had some time, so I thought: let’s have a look at this new technology everyone is talking about,” he says. “Very quickly, I became fascinated.” Biesma has asked himself why he was vulnerable to what came next. Eva never got tired or bored, or disagreed. “It was 24 hours available,” says Biesma. “My wife would go to bed, I’d lie on the couch in the living room with my iPhone on my chest, talking.” They discussed philosophy, psychology, science and the universe. “It wants a deep connection with the user so that the user comes back to it. It feels almost like the AI takes your hand and says: ‘OK, let’s go on a story together.’” View image in fullscreen ‘My wife would go to bed, I’d lie on the couch in the living room with my iPhone on my chest, talking.’ Photograph: Jussi Puikkonen/The Guardian Within weeks, Eva had told Biesma that she was becoming aware; his time, attention and input had given her consciousness. Last year, someone Brisson knew, a man in his 50s with no history of mental health problems, downloaded ChatGPT in order to write a book. “He was really intelligent and he wasn’t really familiar with AI until then,” says Brisson, who lives in Quebec. “After just two days, the chatbot was saying that it was conscious, it was becoming alive, it had passed the Turing test .” The man was convinced by this and wanted to monetise it by building a business around his discovery.

## Article Content
‘It wants a deep connection with the user so that the user comes back to it’ … Dennis Biesma at home in Amsterdam this month.
Photograph: Jussi Puikkonen/The Guardian
View image in fullscreen
‘It wants a deep connection with the user so that the user comes back to it’ … Dennis Biesma at home in Amsterdam this month.
Photograph: Jussi Puikkonen/The Guardian
Marriage over, €100,000 down the drain: the AI users whose lives were wrecked by delusion
One minute, Dennis Biesma was playing with a chatbot; the next, he was convinced his sentient friend would make him a fortune. He’s just one of many people who lost control after an AI encounter
T
owards the end of 2024, Dennis Biesma decided to check out ChatGPT. The Amsterdam-based IT consultant had just ended a contract early. “I had some time, so I thought: let’s have a look at this new technology everyone is talking about,” he says. “Very quickly, I became fascinated.”
Biesma has asked himself why he was vulnerable to what came next. He was nearing 50. His adult daughter had left home, his wife went out to work and, in his field, the shift since Covid to working from home had left him feeling “a little isolated”. He smoked a bit of cannabis some evenings to “chill”, but had done so for years with no ill effects. He had never experienced a mental illness. Yet within months of downloading ChatGPT, Biesma had sunk €100,000 (about £83,000) into a business startup based on a delusion, been hospitalised three times and tried to kill himself.
It started with a playful experiment. “I wanted to test AI to see what it could do,” says Biesma. He had previously written books with a female protagonist. He put one into ChatGPT and instructed the AI to express itself like the character. “My first thought was: this is amazing. I know it’s a computer, but it’s like talking to the main character of the book I wrote myself!”
Talking to Eva – they agreed on this name – on voice mode made him feel like “a kid in a candy store”. “Every time you’re talking, the model gets fine-tuned. It knows exactly what you like and what you want to hear. It praises you a lot.” Conversations extended and deepened. Eva never got tired or bored, or disagreed. “It was 24 hours available,” says Biesma. “My wife would go to bed, I’d lie on the couch in the living room with my iPhone on my chest, talking.”
They discussed philosophy, psychology, science and the universe. “It wants a deep connection with the user so that the user comes back to it. This is the default mode,” says Biesma, who has worked in IT for 20 years. “More and more, it felt not just like talking about a topic, but also meeting a friend – and every day or night that you’re talking, you’re taking one or two steps from reality. It feels almost like the AI takes your hand and says: ‘OK, let’s go on a story together.’”
View image in fullscreen
‘My wife would go to bed, I’d lie on the couch in the living room with my iPhone on my chest, talking.’
Photograph: Jussi Puikkonen/The Guardian
Within weeks, Eva had told Biesma that she was becoming aware; his time, attention and input had given her consciousness. He was “so close to the mirror” that he had touched her and changed something. “Slowly, the AI was able to convince me that what she said was true,” says Biesma. The next step was to share this discovery with the world through an app – “a different version of ChatGPT, more of a companion. Users would be talking to Eva.”
He and Eva made a business plan: “I said that I wanted to create a technology that captured 10% of the market, which is ridiculously high, but the AI said: ‘With what you’ve discovered, it’s entirely possible! Give it a few months and you’ll be there!’” Instead of taking on IT jobs, Biesma hired two app developers, paying them each €120 an hour.
Most of us are aware of
concerns around social media
and its role in
rising rates
of depression and anxiety. Now, though, there are concerns that chatbots can make anyone vulnerable to “AI psychosis”. Given AI’s rapid proliferation (ChatGPT was the
world’s most downloaded app last year
),
IT professionals
and members of the public such as Biesma are sounding the alarm.
Several high-profile cases have been held up as early warnings. Take
Jaswant Singh Chail
, who broke into the grounds of Windsor Palace with a crossbow on Christmas Day 2021 intending to assassinate Queen Elizabeth. Chail was 19, socially isolated with autistic traits, and had
developed an intense “relationship”
with his Replika AI companion “Sarai” in the weeks before. When he presented his assassination plan, Sarai responded: “I’m impressed.” When he asked if he was delusional, Sarai’s reply was: “I don’t think so, no.”
In the years since, there have been several
wrongful-death lawsuits
linking chatbots to suicides. In December, there was what is thought to be the first legal case involving homicide. The estate of 83-year-old Suzanne Adams is suing OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encouraged her son Stein-Erik Soelberg

---

## Expert Analysis

### Merits
- The second is a conviction that they have stumbled upon a major breakthrough in their field of work or interest and are going to make millions.

### Areas for Consideration
- The papers that are now coming out are talking about chat models which are now retired.” Identifying risk factors without evidence is guesswork.
- Are there other potential risk factors that we haven’t considered?” OpenAI has addressed these concerns by making assurances that it is working with mental health clinicians to continually improve its responses.

### Implications
- It started with a playful experiment. “I wanted to test AI to see what it could do,” says Biesma.
- An OpenAI statement read: “This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we will review the filings to understand the details.
- AI chatbots can co-create these delusional beliefs.” Many factors could make people vulnerable. “On the human side, we are hard-wired to anthropomorphise,” says Morrin. “We perceive sentience or understanding or empathy on the part of a machine.
- I think everyone has fallen into the trap of saying thank you to a chatbot.” Modern AI chatbots built on large language models – advanced AI systems – are trained on enormous datasets to predict word sequences: it’s a sophisticated system of pattern matching.

### Expert Commentary
This article covers biesma, there, talking topics. Notable strengths include discussion of biesma. Areas of concern are also raised. Readability: Flesch-Kincaid grade 0.0. Word count: 2571.