Elon Musk's X advertising boycott lawsuit dismissed by US judge

## Summary
Elon Musk's X advertising boycott lawsuit dismissed by US judge 45 minutes ago Share Save Laura Cress Technology reporter Share Save Getty Images A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Elon Musk's X which accused a group of advertisers and major companies of illegally boycotting his platform. Its parent company X Corp alleged in 2024 that firms including food giants Unilever and Mars, renewable energy firm Orsted and the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) had conspired to deprive it of "billions of dollars" in advertising revenue. X Corp's lawsuit, filed in a Texas court in 2024 , came after the platform saw a decline in advertising revenue following Musk's acquisition of Twitter in 2022. Now, it is war." X Corp's lawsuit alleged the accused firms had unfairly withheld spending by following safety standards set out by a WFA initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media (Garm).

## Article Content
Elon Musk's X advertising boycott lawsuit dismissed by US judge
45 minutes ago
Share
Save
Laura Cress
Technology reporter
Share
Save
Getty Images
A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Elon Musk's X which accused a group of advertisers and major companies of illegally boycotting his platform.
Its parent company X Corp alleged in 2024 that firms including food giants Unilever and Mars, renewable energy firm Orsted and the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) had conspired to deprive it of "billions of dollars" in advertising revenue.
But in Thursday's ruling, US District Judge Jane Boyle said the company had failed to show it had suffered any harm under federal competition laws.
The BBC has approached X for comment.
X Corp's lawsuit,
filed in a Texas court in 2024
, came after the platform saw a decline in advertising revenue following Musk's acquisition of Twitter in 2022.
The tech billionaire had ushered in
sweeping changes to the platform
after purchasing it, including reinstating the accounts of controversial figures and lifting some content restrictions.
Within a year of Musk acquiring X, advertising revenue had fallen by more than half as some firms paused or reduced their promotions on the site.
The lawsuit claimed the group of advertisers had acted against their own economic self-interest to conspire against the platform - saying this violated US antitrust laws designed to promote fair competition between companies.
At the time, Musk tweeted: "We tried being nice for 2 years and got nothing but empty words. Now, it is war."
X Corp's lawsuit alleged the accused firms had unfairly withheld spending by following safety standards set out by a WFA initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media (Garm).
Garm's stated aim is to "help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetisation via advertising".
CVS and the other defendants denied any wrongdoing and, in counter-filings, urged Judge Boyle to dismiss the lawsuit.
They argued they had acted independently when making business decisions about when and where to spend advertising money, and said X had failed to illustrate otherwise.
Boyle appeared to agree, writing in an opinion filed alongside her judgement that Garm "did not buy advertising space from X to sell to advertisers nor did it, in such an arrangement, tell X not to sell directly to Garm's customers".
"The very nature of the alleged conspiracy does not state an antitrust claim, and the court therefore has no qualm dismissing with prejudice," she concluded.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter
to follow the world's top tech stories and trends.
Outside the UK? Sign up here
.
Social media
Elon Musk
Twitter

---

## Expert Analysis

### Merits
N/A

### Areas for Consideration
- Garm's stated aim is to "help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetisation via advertising".

### Implications
N/A

### Expert Commentary
This article covers advertising, musk, lawsuit topics. Areas of concern are also raised. Readability: Flesch-Kincaid grade 0.0. Word count: 445.