Wisconsin Law Review’s 2022 Symposium
Schedule and information for Wisconsin Law Review Symposia.
TheWisconsin Law Reviewpresents a major constitutional conference for its annual symposium, Oct. 28-29, 2022:
The symposium will be co-hosted by Bruce Ledewitz, Adrian Van Kaam C.S.Sp. Endowed Chair in Scholarly Excellence at Duquesne University School of Law and Eric Segall,Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law,with a nationally renowned array of participants.
The symposium represents the first opportunity for a national panel of constitutional experts to reflect on the extraordinary events of this past Supreme Court term, from overruling Roe v. Wade to new interpretive approaches in the areas of religion, gun rights, administrative, and Native American law.
Professor Ledewitz will present the symposium’s opening address,On Controlling the Supreme Court: Is There a Future for American Law?
Response by Professor Segall:Is Constitutional Law Really Law?
Successive panels over the two days of the symposium will address the following topics:
The symposium will close with a remark on comparative constitutionalism by Richard Albert, William Stamps Farish Professor in Law, Professor of Government, and Director of Constitutional Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.
Papers from the symposium will be published in theWisconsin Law Review.
For questions about this event, please contact Elizabeth Ierulli & Sophia Pfander ateierulli@wisc.edu&spfander@wisc.edu.
Panel One:Did this Term Show a Court “Out of Control” or Was it Before? What Kind of Future Will it Be?
Panelists:J. Joel Alicea;Caroline Mala Corbin;Mary Anne Franks;Eugene Volokh;Maggie Blackhawk
Panel Two:Controlling the Court Through a Broken Confirmation Process: How to Fix it Going Forward?
Panelists:Jonathan Adler;Caroline Fredrickson;Lori Ringhand;Christopher Sprigman
Panel Three:Controlling the Court Through Method: Will Originalism Triumph?
Panelists:Tara Leigh Grove;Jennifer Mascott;Michael Rappaport;Aaron Tang
Panel Four:Controlling the Court Through Precedent: Is the Past the Future?
Panelists:Michael Gerhardt;Fred Smith Jr.;Ilya Somin;Nina Varsava;Philip Williamson
Panel Five:Controlling the Court Through Democratic Action: Risking the Rule of Law?
Panelists:Joshua Braver;Franciska Coleman;Daniel Epps;Barry Friedman;Michele Goodwin
Executive Summary
The Wisconsin Law Review's 2022 symposium, co-hosted by Bruce Ledewitz and Eric Segall, brings together a national panel of constitutional experts to discuss the extraordinary events of the past Supreme Court term. The symposium addresses topics such as the overruling of Roe v. Wade, new interpretive approaches, and the future of American law. The event features five panels with renowned panelists and will conclude with a remark on comparative constitutionalism by Richard Albert. Papers from the symposium will be published in the Wisconsin Law Review.
Key Points
- ▸ The symposium discusses the implications of the past Supreme Court term on American law
- ▸ The event features a national panel of constitutional experts
- ▸ The symposium addresses topics such as the overruling of Roe v. Wade and new interpretive approaches
Merits
Comprehensive Analysis
The symposium provides a comprehensive analysis of the past Supreme Court term and its implications on American law
Renowned Panelists
The event features a national panel of constitutional experts, ensuring a high level of discussion and insight
Demerits
Limited Scope
The symposium may not address all aspects of the past Supreme Court term, potentially leaving some topics unexplored
Potential Bias
The panelists' perspectives may be influenced by their individual biases, potentially affecting the objectivity of the discussion
Expert Commentary
The Wisconsin Law Review's 2022 symposium offers a timely and insightful analysis of the past Supreme Court term. The event's comprehensive approach, featuring a national panel of constitutional experts, provides a unique opportunity for scholars and practitioners to engage with the most pressing issues in American law. The symposium's discussion on the overruling of Roe v. Wade and new interpretive approaches is particularly noteworthy, as it highlights the ongoing debate about the role of the judiciary in shaping the country's legal landscape. Ultimately, the symposium's findings and recommendations will likely have significant implications for the development of American law and policy.
Recommendations
- ✓ Scholars and practitioners should engage with the symposium's findings and recommendations to inform their understanding of American law
- ✓ Policymakers should consider the symposium's analysis when developing legislation and policy decisions related to constitutional law
