Russian experience of using digital technologies and legal risks of AI
The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of
The aim of the present article is to analyze the Russian experience of using digital technologies in law and legal risks of artificial intelligence (AI). The result of the present research is the author’s conclusion on the necessity of the practical implementation of legal provisions in this area, and their judicial enforcement in federal subjects with the aim of compliance with international standards of human rights. The authors concluded that in the Russian Federation, there is no normative and technical regulation of the process of destruction of personal data, which creates serious problems for operators. The research methodology based on general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition (the dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal and historical legal methods). Moreover, the range of legislative and law enforcement problems in the field of using AI technology is very extensive. For this reason, the authors of the article used the methodology for collecting data on legislative acts and legal regulation in the field under research. A number of federal and regional legal acts were analyzed using systemic-structural and formal-dogmatic methods, including the research of their practical orientation and effectiveness for modern challenges.
Executive Summary
The article examines the Russian experience with digital technologies in law, focusing on the legal risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI). It highlights the lack of normative and technical regulation regarding the destruction of personal data, which poses significant challenges for operators. The research employs a variety of methodological approaches, including dialectical, analytical, and comparative legal methods, to assess the effectiveness of existing legislative acts. The authors conclude that there is a pressing need for the practical implementation and judicial enforcement of legal provisions to align with international human rights standards.
Key Points
- ▸ Analysis of Russian digital technology use in law and AI legal risks
- ▸ Identification of gaps in normative and technical regulation of personal data destruction
- ▸ Emphasis on the necessity of practical implementation and judicial enforcement of legal provisions
- ▸ Use of diverse methodological approaches to assess legislative effectiveness
Merits
Comprehensive Methodology
The article employs a robust range of methodological approaches, including dialectical, analytical, and comparative legal methods, which enhances the depth and breadth of the research.
Practical Focus
The research emphasizes the practical implementation and judicial enforcement of legal provisions, which is crucial for addressing real-world challenges.
Demerits
Limited Scope
The article primarily focuses on the Russian context, which may limit its applicability to other jurisdictions with different legal and regulatory frameworks.
General Conclusions
While the conclusions are insightful, they are somewhat general and could benefit from more specific recommendations for policy and practice.
Expert Commentary
The article provides a valuable analysis of the Russian experience with digital technologies and AI, highlighting significant legal risks and regulatory gaps. The comprehensive methodology employed adds rigor to the research, making it a notable contribution to the field. However, the focus on the Russian context limits its broader applicability. The emphasis on practical implementation and judicial enforcement is commendable, but the conclusions could be strengthened with more specific recommendations. The article's discussion on the destruction of personal data is particularly relevant in the context of global data privacy concerns. Overall, the research underscores the need for robust regulatory frameworks to address the challenges posed by AI and digital technologies, aligning with international human rights standards.
Recommendations
- ✓ Expand the research to include comparative analyses with other jurisdictions to provide a more global perspective.
- ✓ Develop specific policy recommendations for legislative bodies to address the identified regulatory gaps and ensure compliance with international standards.
