Attribution-Guided Model Rectification of Unreliable Neural Network Behaviors
arXiv:2603.15656v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of neural network models deteriorates due to their unreliable behavior on non-robust features of corrupted samples. Owing to their opaque nature, rectifying models to address this problem often necessitates arduous data cleaning and model retraining, resulting in huge computational and manual overhead. In this work, we leverage rank-one model editing to establish an attribution-guided model rectification framework that effectively locates and corrects model unreliable behaviors. We first distinguish our rectification setting from existing model editing, yielding a formulation that corrects unreliable behavior while preserving model performance and reducing reliance on large budgets of cleansed samples. We further reveal a bottleneck of model rectifying arising from heterogeneous editability across layers. To target the primary source of misbehavior, we introduce an attribution-guided layer localization method that quantif
arXiv:2603.15656v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of neural network models deteriorates due to their unreliable behavior on non-robust features of corrupted samples. Owing to their opaque nature, rectifying models to address this problem often necessitates arduous data cleaning and model retraining, resulting in huge computational and manual overhead. In this work, we leverage rank-one model editing to establish an attribution-guided model rectification framework that effectively locates and corrects model unreliable behaviors. We first distinguish our rectification setting from existing model editing, yielding a formulation that corrects unreliable behavior while preserving model performance and reducing reliance on large budgets of cleansed samples. We further reveal a bottleneck of model rectifying arising from heterogeneous editability across layers. To target the primary source of misbehavior, we introduce an attribution-guided layer localization method that quantifies layer-wise editability and identifies the layer most responsible for unreliabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in correcting unreliabilities observed for neural Trojans, spurious correlations and feature leakage. Our method shows remarkable performance by achieving its editing objective with as few as a single cleansed sample, which makes it appealing for practice.
Executive Summary
This article proposes an attribution-guided model rectification framework to address unreliable neural network behaviors. The framework leverages rank-one model editing to locate and correct model unreliabilities, reducing reliance on large budgets of cleansed samples. The approach introduces an attribution-guided layer localization method to quantify layer-wise editability and identify the layer most responsible for unreliabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in correcting unreliabilities observed for neural Trojans, spurious correlations, and feature leakage.
Key Points
- ▸ Attribution-guided model rectification framework
- ▸ Rank-one model editing for locating and correcting model unreliabilities
- ▸ Attribution-guided layer localization method for identifying responsible layers
Merits
Efficient Rectification
The proposed framework achieves its editing objective with as few as a single cleansed sample, making it appealing for practice.
Improved Model Performance
The approach preserves model performance while correcting unreliable behaviors.
Demerits
Limited Generalizability
The framework may not be applicable to all types of neural network models or unreliable behaviors.
Computational Overhead
The approach may still require significant computational resources for model retraining and editing.
Expert Commentary
The proposed attribution-guided model rectification framework is a significant contribution to the field of AI safety and reliability. The approach addresses the critical issue of unreliable neural network behaviors and provides a efficient and effective solution. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and potential applications of the framework. The approach has important implications for both practical and policy aspects of AI development and deployment.
Recommendations
- ✓ Further research is needed to evaluate the generalizability and applicability of the framework to different types of neural network models and applications.
- ✓ The approach should be integrated with other AI safety and reliability techniques to provide a comprehensive solution.