Conference

AAAI Publication Policies & Guidelines - AAAI

AAAI publication policies provides instructions and forms for authors with an accepted paper that will be published by AAAI Press.

· · 2 min read · 11 views

AAAI publication policies and guidelines provide instructions and forms for authors with an accepted paper in a Proceedings or Technical Report that will be formally published by AAAI Press. To obtain such information, please download the author kit for your specific conference. The URL for this kit appears in your acceptance letter. Policy on use of AI systems in producing AAAI or AAAI-related publications “It is AAAI’s policy that any AI system, including Generative Models such as Chat-GPT , BARD, and DALL-E, does not satisfy the criteria for authorship of papers published by AAAI and, as such, also cannot be used as a citable source in papers published by AAAI. This includes papers submitted for publication in the AAAI Conference Proceedings, the proceedings of all other AAAI co-organized and cooperating conferences and workshops, and AI Magazine. Attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to AI systems. Further, the use of any AI system in the development of an AAAI-affiliated publication is only allowed if its role is properly documented in the manuscript. Ultimately, all authors are responsible for the entire content of their papers, including text, figures, references, and appendices.” Reviewer Policy We would like to remind AAAI reviewers that all conference submissions have to be kept confidential. Because of this, submitted papers cannot be uploaded into any system that does not ensure that they are not shared with others. This includes also prompting Large Language Models with papers or parts of them, because these systems may disclose part of the prompt to other users. We would also like to remind reviewers that they are fully responsible for the entire content of their reviews, so tools can be used to improve the wording of the review but not to generate its content. Author Instructions Authors of AAAI Press monographs, edited collections, and AI Magazine authors should first consult the instructions on the AAAI Press and AI Magazine Web pages. These instructions are provided primarily for persons who plan to publish a conference, workshop, or symposium paper. Publications Ethics and Malpractice Statement The AAAI Publications Ethics and Malpractice Statement was created and approved by the Publications Committee. The current version updated in July 2024. Publication Policy The AAAI Publication Policy was created by the Publications Committee. The current version was approved on May 8, 2017. Reproducing Copyright Materials Request Form to Reproduce Copyright Materials Submit an Erratum or Errata How to submit an erratum or errata to a previously published paper in the AAAI digital Library. The current version was updated in November 2022.

Executive Summary

The AAAI Publication Policies & Guidelines outline the procedures and ethical standards for authors, reviewers, and publishers involved in AAAI-affiliated publications. Key points include the prohibition of AI systems as authors or citable sources, the responsibility of reviewers to maintain confidentiality, and the ethical guidelines for authors. The document also provides instructions for reproducing copyrighted materials and submitting errata. The policies aim to ensure the integrity and accountability of academic publications in the field of AI.

Key Points

  • AI systems cannot be authors or citable sources in AAAI publications.
  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and are responsible for their reviews.
  • Authors must document the use of AI systems in their manuscripts.
  • Ethical guidelines and procedures for reproducing copyrighted materials are provided.

Merits

Clear Guidelines

The document provides clear and comprehensive guidelines for authors and reviewers, ensuring consistency and transparency in the publication process.

Ethical Standards

The emphasis on ethical standards and accountability helps maintain the integrity of academic publications.

Documentation Requirements

Requiring documentation of AI use ensures transparency and accountability in the research process.

Demerits

Potential Overreach

The strict prohibition on AI systems as authors or sources may limit the potential benefits of AI in academic research.

Confidentiality Concerns

The requirement for reviewers to maintain confidentiality may pose challenges in the era of digital sharing and AI systems.

Administrative Burden

The detailed instructions and forms may create an administrative burden for authors and reviewers.

Expert Commentary

The AAAI Publication Policies & Guidelines represent a significant step towards ensuring the integrity and accountability of academic publications in the field of AI. By prohibiting AI systems from being listed as authors or citable sources, AAAI aims to maintain the human accountability that is crucial for the credibility of research. However, this strict stance may also limit the potential benefits of AI in academic research, such as improving efficiency and reducing human bias. The requirement for reviewers to maintain confidentiality and be responsible for their reviews is commendable, but it may pose challenges in the digital age where information sharing is prevalent. The detailed instructions and forms provided may create an administrative burden, but they ensure consistency and transparency in the publication process. Overall, the policies set a high standard for ethical conduct in academic publishing and may influence other organizations to adopt similar guidelines.

Recommendations

  • AAAI should consider allowing limited use of AI systems in the publication process, provided that their role is clearly documented and justified.
  • The organization should provide additional resources and support to help authors and reviewers comply with the guidelines, reducing the administrative burden.

Sources

Related Articles