2026 - Call For Blogposts
2026 - Call For Blogposts Key Dates Abstract & Submission deadline : December 7th, 2025 23:59 AOE Submit to OpenReview Any modifications to your blog post, via a pull request on github Notification of acceptance : February 21st, 2026 Camera-ready merge : March 15th, 2026 Call for blog posts Last year, we ran the fourth iteration of the Blogpost track at ICLR 2025! It was very successful, with accepted posts presented in person at the main conference. We invite all researchers and practitioners to submit a blog post which: Reviews past work and summarize the outcomes, develop new intuitions, or highlight some shortcomings. Presents novel perspectives or interpretations of existing machine learning concepts or techniques. Discusses important issues in machine learning, such as reproducibility, from a novel perspective. Analyzes the societal implications of recent advancements in machine learning and AI. Showcases cool research ideas that you tried but did not work out. We will not consider politically motivated blogposts for publication. If you are unsure about the content of your post you can reach us at iclr-blogpost-track@googlegroups.com . Past blog posts can be accessed here: 2022 , 2023 , 2024 , 2025 . Conflict of interest The authors of the blog posts will have to declare their conflicts of interest (positive or negative) with the paper (and the paper’s authors) they write about. Conflicts of interest include: Recent collaborators (less than 3 years) Current institution – reviewers will be asked to judge if the submission is sufficiently critical and objective of the papers addressed in the blog post. Blog Posts must not be used to highlight or advertise past publications of the authors or their lab . We will only ask the authors to report if they have a conflict of interest. If so, reviewers will be asked to judge if the submission is sufficiently critical and objective of the papers addressed in the blog post. Publication The posts will be created and published under a unified template; see the submission instructions and the sample post hosted on the blog of this website. Poster Additionally, accepted posts will have the option to present their work as a poster during the main poster session. For more information about the main poster session (time, poster format, etc.) please refer to the ICLR homepage. Submissions Our goal is to avoid heavily engineered, professionally-made blog posts —Such as the “100+ hours” mentioned as a standard by the Distill guidelines —to entice ideas and clear writing rather than dynamic visualizations or embedded javascript engines. Please check our submission instructions for more details. We accept submissions in both Markdown and HTML. We believe this is a good trade-off between complexity and flexibility. Submit your blogpost on Openreview Contact For any technical issues with the blog post repository (for example, blog posts not displaying correctly or issues while following the submission instructions ), please open an issue in our github repository . For other inquiries, reach us via email at: iclr-blogpost-track@googlegroups.com For more information, visit our website: https://iclr-blogposts.github.io/2026/about/ Successful Page Load ICLR uses cookies for essential functions only. We do not sell your personal information. Our Privacy Policy » Accept
Executive Summary
The call for blog posts for the ICLR 2026 conference invites researchers and practitioners to submit blog posts that review past work, present novel perspectives, discuss important issues, analyze societal implications, or showcase research ideas that did not work out. The submission process involves declaring conflicts of interest and adhering to specific guidelines to ensure objectivity and avoid political motivations. Accepted posts will be published under a unified template and may be presented as posters during the main conference.
Key Points
- ▸ Call for blog posts on various aspects of machine learning and AI for ICLR 2026
- ▸ Submissions must be objective and free from political motivations
- ▸ Authors must declare conflicts of interest
- ▸ Accepted posts will be published under a unified template and may be presented as posters
- ▸ Submissions should prioritize clear writing over dynamic visualizations
Merits
Encourages Diverse Perspectives
The call for blog posts encourages a wide range of topics, including reviews, novel perspectives, societal implications, and failed research ideas, fostering a comprehensive discussion in the field.
Promotes Objectivity and Transparency
The requirement to declare conflicts of interest ensures that the blog posts are objective and critical, enhancing the credibility of the published content.
Accessible Submission Process
The submission process is designed to be accessible, accepting both Markdown and HTML formats, and avoiding the need for heavily engineered, professionally-made blog posts.
Demerits
Potential for Bias in Review Process
Despite the declaration of conflicts of interest, there is still a potential for bias in the review process, which could affect the objectivity of the accepted blog posts.
Limited Scope for Visualizations
The emphasis on clear writing over dynamic visualizations may limit the ability of authors to present complex ideas effectively, potentially reducing the impact of some submissions.
Exclusion of Politically Motivated Posts
The exclusion of politically motivated blog posts, while ensuring neutrality, may also limit the scope of discussions on important ethical and societal issues related to AI and machine learning.
Expert Commentary
The call for blog posts for ICLR 2026 represents a valuable initiative to foster diverse and critical discussions within the machine learning and AI community. By encouraging submissions that review past work, present novel perspectives, and analyze societal implications, the call aims to create a comprehensive and reflective dialogue. The requirement to declare conflicts of interest is a commendable effort to ensure objectivity and transparency, although the potential for bias in the review process remains a concern. The emphasis on clear writing over dynamic visualizations may limit the impact of some submissions, but it aligns with the goal of making the submission process accessible. The exclusion of politically motivated posts ensures neutrality but may also restrict discussions on important ethical issues. Overall, this call for blog posts has the potential to significantly contribute to the field by promoting open science, transparency, and critical reflection.
Recommendations
- ✓ Encourage reviewers to be vigilant about potential biases and ensure that the review process remains objective and fair.
- ✓ Consider allowing a limited use of visualizations to enhance the presentation of complex ideas without compromising the accessibility of the submission process.
