2025 Committees
NeurIPS 2025 Organizing Committee General Chair Danielle Belgrave GSK.ai Cheng Zhang Ellison Institute of Technology Mexico City General Chair Laura Montoya Accel AI Senior Program Chair Hsuan-Tien Lin National Taiwan University Program Chair Marzyeh Ghassemi MIT Piotr Koniusz Data61❤CSIRO Razvan Pascanu Google DeepMind, Mila Nancy Chen A*STAR Program Chair Assistant Isha Puri MIT Po-Yi Lu National Taiwan University Zhengyuan Liu Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore Elena Burceanu Bitdefender Junhao Dong Nanyang Technological University / CFAR, A*STAR Mexico City Program Chair Ivan Vladimir Meza Ruiz Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Arturo LoAIza-Bonilla Massive Bio | SLUHN Workshop Chair Theodore Papamarkou PolyShape Pascale N Fung Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Manuel Gomez Rodriguez Max Planck Institute for Software Systems Workshop Chair Assistant Stratis Tsirtsis Max Planck Institute for Software Systems Nina Corvelo Benz Max-Planck Institute for Software Systems / ETH Mexico City Workshop Chair Ponciano Jorge Escamilla-Ambrosio Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIC Andy Peng Amazon Tutorial Chair Elias Bareinboim Columbia University Irene Chen UC Berkeley Mexico City Tutorial Chair Diana Galván Sosa ALTA Institute, University of Cambridge Datasets and Benchmarks Chair Megan Risdal Kaggle Francesco Locatello ISTA Joaquin Vanschoren Eindhoven University of Technology, Google DeepMind Konstantina Palla Spotify Lora Aroyo Google DeepMind Next Generation and Accessibility Chair Erin Grant New York University Caroline Weis gsk.ai Zoe Ma Position Track Chair Barbara Engelhardt Stanford University Cynthia Rudin Duke Katherine Gorman AnalogyDigital Position Track Assistant Chair B Cavello The Aspen Institute Edric Tam Stanford University Social Chair Ehsan Adeli Stanford University Saining Xie Google DeepMind / NYU Alessandra Tosi Mind Foundry Mexico City Social Chair Lourdes Martinez-Villaseñor Universidad Panamericana Eduardo Moya LatinX Ethics Review Chair Himabindu Lakkaraju Harvard Stephanie Hyland Microsoft Research Jiahao Chen New York City Office of Technology and Innovation Affinity Chair Sarthak Arora UC Berkeley Ioana Bica Google DeepMind Nezihe Merve Gürel Creative AI Chair Yingtao Tian Sakana AI Luba Elliott elluba.com Marcelo Coelho MIT Priya Prakash D4SC.io Journal Chair Lam Nguyen IBM Research, Thomas J. Watson Research Center Communication Chair Alex X Lu Microsoft Research Mengye Ren New York University Jean Kossaifi NVIDIA Research Mexico City Communication and Next Generation Chair Gilberto Ochoa-Ruiz Tec de Monterrey Education Chair Fei Fang Carnegie Mellon University Aditya Grover University of California, Los Angeles Assistant Education Chair Naveen Raman Carnegie Mellon University Workflow Manager Zhenyu (Sherry) Xue NeurIPS Marco Fumero Institute of Science and Technology, Austria Anna Vettoruzzo Eindhoven University of Technology Competition Chair Jes Frellsen Technical University of Denmark Tao Qin Zhongguancun Academy Kun Zhang CMU & MBZUAI Mexico City Competition Chair Leobardo Morales Tec de Monterrey Valeria Amato Politecnico di Milano Experiment Chair Pengchuan Zhang Meta AI David Rolnick McGill / Mila Jonas Geiping ELLIS Institute & MPI Intelligent Systems, Tübingen AI Center Mexico City Volunteer Chair Ana Rocio Cárdenas Maita University of Sao Paulo MIGUEL GONZALEZ-MENDOZA Tecnologico de Monterrey Successful Page Load NeurIPS uses cookies for essential functions only. We do not sell your personal information. Our Privacy Policy » Accept
Executive Summary
The article outlines the organizational structure for the NeurIPS 2025 conference, detailing the roles and affiliations of various committee members. The committee includes chairs and assistants for general, program, workshop, tutorial, datasets and benchmarks, next generation and accessibility, position track, social, ethics review, affinity, creative AI, journal, communication, education, and workflow management. The committee members represent a diverse range of institutions and geographical locations, indicating a global effort to organize the conference. The inclusion of specific roles such as ethics review and next generation and accessibility chairs highlights the conference's commitment to addressing contemporary issues in AI research.
Key Points
- ▸ Diverse and global representation in the NeurIPS 2025 Organizing Committee
- ▸ Specialized roles addressing ethics, accessibility, and next-generation research
- ▸ Inclusion of both academic and industry professionals
Merits
Global Representation
The committee includes members from various countries and institutions, ensuring a broad perspective and fostering international collaboration.
Specialized Roles
The inclusion of roles like Ethics Review Chair and Next Generation and Accessibility Chair demonstrates a proactive approach to addressing critical issues in AI.
Diverse Expertise
The committee members come from a mix of academic and industry backgrounds, bringing a balanced and comprehensive approach to conference organization.
Demerits
Potential Overlap
Some roles and responsibilities might overlap, leading to potential inefficiencies or conflicts in decision-making.
Geographical Bias
While diverse, the committee might still have a bias towards certain regions, which could affect the inclusivity of the conference.
Expert Commentary
The NeurIPS 2025 Organizing Committee's structure is a testament to the evolving landscape of AI research. The inclusion of specialized roles such as Ethics Review Chair and Next Generation and Accessibility Chair reflects a growing awareness of the ethical and social implications of AI. The global representation among committee members ensures a broad perspective, which is crucial for addressing the diverse challenges and opportunities in AI. However, potential overlaps in roles and geographical biases should be carefully managed to maintain efficiency and inclusivity. The committee's composition can set a precedent for other conferences, emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations and accessibility in AI research. Overall, the committee's structure is a positive step towards fostering a more inclusive and ethically conscious AI community.
Recommendations
- ✓ Regularly review and adjust committee roles to minimize overlap and ensure efficiency.
- ✓ Actively seek to include members from underrepresented regions to enhance geographical diversity.
